In the world of wrestling, the line between a legitimate match and a staged performance can be a blur. Some might argue that working less makes a wrestler less impressive, but crying in the ring is even more concerning. The author takes a stance on this matter, advocating for a unified approach: everything is a work. This perspective simplifies the complexities of the wrestling business. However, the author acknowledges that if communication breaks down and performers resort to real blows, this stance may need to be re-evaluated. This leads to a discussion about the ongoing feud between Rhea Ripley and Jade Cargill, which has sparked involvement from Chelsea Green and Piper Niven. Niven's comment about Cargill's frequent vacations and her own recovery from injury adds fuel to the fire. The author dismisses the criticism of Cargill's reduced work schedule, arguing that it's a storyline choice and not a reflection of her dedication. The piece then takes a bold stance, challenging the audience: would they agree to work less for the same salary? It presents a scenario where a doubled salary and a reduced workload are offered, making it a no-brainer. The author uses baseball as an example, highlighting that Randy Johnson, with his extensive pitching, earned a similar amount to Mariano Rivera, who had a shorter career. This demonstrates that the quality of work, not the quantity, determines success and compensation. The key message is that exceptional performers can afford to show up less, as long as it's when it matters. The author concludes by emphasizing that the only embarrassing aspect is being left with the heavy bag, crying, while others carry lighter ones and earn more.
